Learn2Reg 2020, Task 3, validation
Abdominal CT scans of two different patients, a validation pair of Learn2Reg 2020 Task 3, with 13 labels on both.
Read before comparing (1)
- Board. The board's HD95 is in voxels of the 2 mm grid: half the value in mm shown here.
No method has a result on every pair of this dataset yet.
| Accuracy | Smoothness | Cost | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Method | Dice | Change | HD95 mm | SDlogJ | Folds % | Time s | RAM GB | GPU GB | Images |
| No registration | 0.259 ±0.022 | 40.21 ±3.44 | 0.000 | 0.00 | ||||||
Dice: how much the organ contours overlap, 1 is perfect. HD95: distance between the contours' surfaces. SDlogJ: how irregular the deformation is, 0 is perfectly smooth. Folds: share of the image where the deformation folds over itself.
Scored the way the challenge scores
The same results with the Learn2Reg 2020, Task 3 challenge's own measures, on its validation pairs: mean ± standard deviation.
| Method | DSC | HD95 | SDlogJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| No registration | 0.259 ± 0.072 | 20.106 ± 5.718 | 0.000 ± 0.000 |
What the challenge published
On the challenge's test set: other pairs than the ones above, and entries trained or tuned for the task. It shows the level of the challenge; these are not results of this benchmark.
| Method | DSC | HD95 | SDlogJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| No registration | 0.280 | 21.78 | |
| ConvexAdam | 0.690 | 11.03 | 0.060 |
| LapIRN | 0.670 | 12.51 | 0.120 |
| Estienne | 0.690 | 11.77 | 0.180 |
| MEVIS | 0.510 | 18.21 | 0.140 |
| corrField | 0.490 | 17.22 | 0.280 |
| PIMed | 0.490 | 15.75 | 0.050 |
| PDD-Net | 0.490 | 17.75 | 0.410 |
| Joutard | 0.400 | 17.25 | 0.050 |
| NiftyReg | 0.450 | 20.70 | 0.360 |
| Gunnarsson | 0.430 | 18.55 | 0.130 |
Pair by pair
| Dice | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No registration | 0.205 | 0.189 | 0.339 | 0.288 | 0.289 | 0.223 | 0.357 | 0.362 | 0.278 | 0.199 | 0.234 | 0.155 | 0.202 | 0.132 | 0.250 | 0.333 | 0.263 | 0.298 | 0.122 | 0.290 | 0.259 | 0.214 | 0.196 | 0.148 | 0.231 | 0.418 | 0.286 | 0.338 | 0.274 | 0.262 | 0.228 | 0.176 | 0.257 | 0.228 | 0.291 | 0.303 | 0.296 | 0.233 | 0.217 | 0.225 | 0.208 | 0.181 | 0.431 | 0.379 | 0.366 |
Click a score to look at that result: the fixed image, and over it the moving image after registration, with the annotations. Underlined scores have their image; for the others you see the pair without the result. A green cell gained against no registration on that pair, a red one lost.
About the data
- Test pairs
- The 45 official validation pairs are the test cases. The 10 development pairs join the 20 of the task's 30 training subjects that are in no validation pair, two by two in the order of sha256("2026:L2R_AbdomenCTCT:<subject>").
- Truth
- contours by experts the challenge's validation labels
- Licence
- unclear: the BTCV terms on Synapse are not public
10 pairs for tuning, never tested
0030_0000_0026_0000, 0024_0000_0011_0000, 0017_0000_0006_0000, 0003_0000_0015_0000, 0023_0000_0021_0000, 0008_0000_0027_0000, 0002_0000_0005_0000, 0018_0000_0009_0000, 0014_0000_0029_0000, 0012_0000_0020_0000