fidoptSpine CT and ultrasound, two ex-vivo phantoms
2 pairs · ordered on TRE and SDlogJ| # | Method | TRE mm | Change | SDlogJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NiftyReg | 16.05 | −178.53 | 0.000 |
| 2 | greedy | 27.85 | −166.73 | 0.000 |
| 3 | ANTs SyN | 25.95 | −168.63 | 0.000 |
| No registration | 194.58 | 0.000 |
Rigid registration, CT to ultrasound
1 datasets, 2 test pairs. A method is ranked here when it has a result on every pair of every one of them.
Read before comparing
- Ranked apart: two ex vivo phantoms of rigid bone, registered from the provider's poses 14 to 25 cm apart.
Ranking OfficialResearch
| # | Method | Mean rank | Spine CT and ultrasound, two ex-vivo phantoms |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NiftyRegCPUapp | 1.501.0–3.0 | 1 |
| 2 | greedyCPUapp | 2.001.0–3.0 | 2 |
| 3 | ANTs SyNCPUapp | 2.501.0–3.0 | 3 |
1 place in that table, 1 is best2/10 cases done, not ranked yetn/a does not apply not run some cases failed
Under each dataset, the method's place in that dataset's table: 1 is best, the darker the better. The mean rank averages its places over the datasets.
The scores, dataset by dataset
Each score is followed by its change against no registration: green when the method did better, red when it did worse.