2 datasets, 40 test pairs. A method is ranked here when it has a result on every pair of every one of them.
| # | Method | Mean rank | CSXA cervical radiographs | Aariz cephalograms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vismatch matchers · RoMaGPU | 1.501.0–6.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | vismatch matchers · LoFTRGPU | 2.752.5–7.5 | 4 | 1 |
| 3 | vismatch matchers · SIFT + LightGlueGPU | 3.751.0–6.0 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | vismatch matchers · ALIKED + LightGlueGPU | 4.502.5–7.5 | 6 | 3 |
| 5 | vismatch matchers · DISK + LightGlueGPU | 5.501.0–6.0 | 2 | 9 |
| 6 | vismatch matchers · XFeatGPU | 5.752.5–7.5 | 4 | 8 |
Under each dataset, the method's place in that dataset's table: 1 is best, the darker the better. The mean rank averages its places over the datasets.
Each score is followed by its change against no registration: green when the method did better, red when it did worse.
| # | Method | TRE mm | Change | SDlogJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vismatch matchers · RoMa | 8.28 | −5.65 | 0.061 |
| 2 | vismatch matchers · DISK + LightGlue | 8.27 | −5.66 | 0.361 |
| 3 | vismatch matchers · SIFT + LightGlue | 13.38 | −0.55 | 0.225 |
| 4 | vismatch matchers · LoFTR | 24.98 | +11.05 | 0.322 |
| 4 | vismatch matchers · XFeat | 12.82 | −1.11 | 0.668 |
| 6 | vismatch matchers · ALIKED + LightGlue | 32.15 | +18.22 | 1.021 |
| No registration | 13.93 | 0.000 |
| # | Method | TRE mm | Change | SDlogJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vismatch matchers · LoFTR | 7.87 | −4.73 | 0.038 |
| 1 | vismatch matchers · RoMa | 7.89 | −4.72 | 0.026 |
| 3 | vismatch matchers · ALIKED + LightGlue | 11.59 | −1.02 | 0.067 |
| 4 | vismatch matchers · SIFT + LightGlue | 11.76 | −0.85 | 0.106 |
| 5 | greedy | 12.53 | −0.07 | 0.070 |
| 6 | ANTs SyN | 12.32 | −0.29 | 0.132 |
| 7 | NiftyReg | 11.93 | −0.67 | 3.219 |
| 8 | vismatch matchers · XFeat | 16.92 | +4.32 | 0.583 |
| 9 | vismatch matchers · DISK + LightGlue | 142.31 | +129.70 | 1.164 |
| No registration | 12.60 | 0.000 |
Digital Hand Atlas radiographs, BUU-LSPINE lumbar radiographs, RHPE hand radiographs.
fidopt