ULS23, lesions in CT volumes of interest
A CT volume of interest of 256 x 256 x 128 voxels centred on one lesion of the chest, abdomen or bones, the lesion segmented in 3D (ULS23 challenge, novel training data: DeepLesion and Radboudumc bone lesions).
Read before comparing (8)
- Pool. The release's novel data: 750 DeepLesion volumes (743 with a mask, 549 patients) chosen by the organisers where a 3D nnU-Net disagreed most with DeepLesion's RECIST diameters, across the chest and abdomen; and 744 bone lesions, sclerotic and lytic, of Radboudumc studies whose reports mention bone disease (697 with a mask, 151 ids). One volume a patient, the first by name; the release's DeepLesion names number patients first, and the bone id is the only one it gives, listed as a patient id in the paper's held-out split though its Table 1 counts 151 series.
- Task. Each volume is cut around one lesion, centred on one of its voxels drawn at random by the provider; other lesions in the volume carry no label. It asks for the lesion at the centre, a task segmenters of whole scans do not take: ranked apart.
- Truth. DeepLesion volumes: trained (bio)medical students drew each lesion in 3D from its RECIST measurement, three times, the majority kept; bone volumes: an experienced radiologist found and drew each lesion. No agreement figure is released for these parts.
- Volumes. 256 x 256 x 128 voxels on the scan's spacing, 0.47 to 0.98 mm in plane. DeepLesion released a few slices around each key slice, so most DeepLesion volumes are 13 to 128 real slices (1 or 5 mm apart) padded to 128 at -1024 HU; bone volumes have 0.8 or 1.5 mm slices. The test lesions hold 0.16 to 202 mL (median 0.93 mL).
- Values. Eight of the twelve bone volumes drawn (those on 1.5 mm slices) are delivered in Hounsfield units plus 1024: prepare.py takes 1024 off any volume whose minimum is 0 or more, so that all are in Hounsfield units. Padding stays as delivered (-1024, -2048 or the scan's minimum less one).
- Start. Labelling the whole volume scores a Dice at the median of the test volumes of 0.0001 (at most 0.020), Otsu's bright voxels 0.0005 (at most 0.046). TotalSegmentator has no lesion task; the challenge's own nnU-Net baseline is not run here.
- Overlap. Not used: the pancreas part, whose Radboudumc patients may be PANORAMA's, and the release's other parts, which recut KiTS21, LIDC-IDRI, LiTS, the decathlon, NIH lymph nodes, CCC18 and DeepLesion's 2D-measured lesions, held elsewhere in the corpus. No other dataset holds DeepLesion; its patients are the NIH Clinical Center's, as are CTLymphNodes_Abdomen's, CTLymphNodes_Mediastinum's and PancreasCT8's, and DeepLesion's anonymised ids cannot be linked to theirs: a patient in two of them cannot be ruled out. The bone ids are not linked to other Radboudumc sets (PANORAMA, PICAI, LUNA25): a patient in two of them cannot be ruled out.
- Outside numbers. None on these volumes: the challenge ranks on its hidden test set of 775 lesions.
No method has a result on every case of this dataset yet.
Case by case
Click a score to look at that result: the image, the truth in green and the method's map in red. Underlined scores have their image; for the others you see the case without the result.
About the data
- Test cases
- 30 test volumes drawn with seed 2026 among the 700 patients of the release's DeepLesion and Radboudumc bone parts, the two in proportion (24 and 6), then 30 development volumes; one volume a patient, the first by name that has a mask. The pancreas part is not used, and the challenge's test volumes are hidden.
- Truth
- contours by experts the lesion the volume is centred on, segmented in 3D: on the DeepLesion volumes by trained (bio)medical students from DeepLesion's RECIST measurement, three a lesion, their majority kept; on the bone volumes by an experienced radiologist; other lesions in the volume are not labelled; no radiologist review of this training data is stated (the DeepLesion masks are the majority of three trained students, drawn from the radiologists' RECIST marks)
- Source
- uls23.grand-challenge.org
zenodo.org/records/10035161
github.com/DIAGNijmegen/ULS23
doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2025.103525 - Licence
- CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
30 cases for tuning, never tested
000711_02_01_537_lesion_01, 003746_01_01_270_lesion_01, bone_00504_lesion_01, 000258_01_01_047_lesion_01, 002642_01_02_022_lesion_01, 001129_02_01_257_lesion_01, bone_00229_lesion_01, 001220_01_01_118_lesion_01, 001994_01_01_046_lesion_01, 000859_01_01_117_lesion_01, 001767_02_01_073_lesion_01, bone_01048_lesion_01, 002358_02_03_017_lesion_01, 003096_01_01_079_lesion_01, 000392_02_01_089_lesion_01, 002016_01_01_007_lesion_01, bone_00254_lesion_01, 003398_01_01_030_lesion_01, 003327_01_01_586_lesion_01, 001969_01_02_328_lesion_01, bone_01064_lesion_02, 000603_05_01_004_lesion_01, 001229_02_01_105_lesion_01, 001079_03_03_140_lesion_01, 003953_01_02_246_lesion_01, bone_00519_lesion_01, 000548_03_01_036_lesion_01, 001152_02_01_066_lesion_01, 000517_04_02_463_lesion_01, 002455_01_01_149_lesion_01