fidopt Interactive view

CTPelvic1K, CLINIC pelvic bones

One preoperative pelvic CT from the CLINIC sub-dataset of CTPelvic1K, with the sacrum and the two hip bones annotated through an iterative network-and-expert correction workflow.

10 test casespelvisimage CT
Read before comparing (5)
  • Source. Only sub-dataset 6, CLINIC's 103 scans, is used; images and masks keep their released values and geometry, without resampling. The images include pelvic fractures.
  • Labels. On the masks checked, label 2 lies on the patient's left and label 3 on the right. Label 4, the lumbar spine, stays in the truth file but is not scored.
  • Overlap. 31 of the 103 CLINIC scans are PENGWIN images under other names: 27 identical voxel for voxel, 4 cropped and flipped (correlation 0.998 to 1.000). A case is kept when its root-mean-square log difference to every PENGWIN case, over the volume and three principal lengths of each bone, is at least 0.04; the shared images lie at 0.002 to 0.016, other images from 0.026. 43 cases pass.
  • Overlap check. The twenty scans drawn, aligned rigidly to the corpus's twenty PENGWIN scans as one bone mask, reach a Dice of at most 0.71, where known shared images reach 0.97 to 0.98: none is a pelvis the corpus already holds. No provider gives a patient crosswalk, and PENGWIN's 50 scans that are not public could not be compared.
  • Cohort. This dataset and PENGWIN share a source cohort; they are grouped apart rather than treated as independent populations.
AccuracyCost
#MethodDiceSurface DiceHD95 mmTime sRAM GBGPU GBImages
11–3KonfAI segmentation app · TotalSegmentator (total), the authors' packageGPUapp0.928 ±0.0070.899 ±0.0191.78 ±0.2319.04.5
21–3KonfAI segmentation app · TotalSegmentator (total), KonfAI appGPUapp0.927 ±0.0080.898 ±0.0201.75 ±0.24283.77.1
31–3CT-FM whole-body segmentationGPUapp0.930 ±0.0190.885 ±0.04114.60 ±10.6715915.76.9
4KonfAI segmentation app · MRSegmentator, KonfAI appGPUapp0.902 ±0.0070.875 ±0.0164.48 ±0.4924.37.8
5MONAI wholeBody CTGPUapp9 failed0.089 ±0.2010.082 ±0.1866.22225.09.0

The order averages each method's ranks on Dice, Surface Dice, HD95 mm, so the first one is not always the best in every column. ± is the 95% interval of the mean over the 10 cases. Two neighbours are tied when a paired Wilcoxon test on the shared cases does not find the upper one better on Dice (5%): the places a method could hold are then shown under its own. The best value of each column is in colour. Click a row to see its images, a column title to sort by it. Time and memory measured on Workstation.

1 result not ranked: an older run, cases still missing, or a failure on every case
AccuracyCost
#MethodDiceSurface DiceHD95 mmTime sRAM GBGPU GBMachineImages
MONAI wholeBody CTGPUappolder run0.908 ±0.0110.850 ±0.0276.91 ±7.73153.012.5Laptop

Dice: how much the organ contours overlap, 1 is perfect. Surface Dice: the share of the contours' surfaces within a tolerance of each other, 1 is perfect. HD95: distance between the contours' surfaces.

Case by case

Click a score to look at that result: the image, the truth in green and the method's map in red. Underlined scores have their image; for the others you see the case without the result.

About the data

The first test case of CTPelvic1K, CLINIC pelvic bones
The first test caseClick to look at every case.
Test cases
10 test and 10 development scans from the 43 CLINIC cases whose pelvic bone shapes differ from all 100 public PENGWIN cases. Test is the first ten in the seed-2026 order, development the last ten.
Truth
contours by a program, verified by people The released sacrum and hip-bone masks, initially threshold-assisted manual contours or network predictions, checked and corrected by human experts in the AID workflow. The CLINIC mask also retains label 4 for lumbar spine, which this pelvic-bone task does not score.
Licence
CC BY 4.0
10 cases for tuning, never tested

CLINIC_0027, CLINIC_0053, CLINIC_0059, CLINIC_0042, CLINIC_0068, CLINIC_0009, CLINIC_0023, CLINIC_0039, CLINIC_0091, CLINIC_0046